I am just introducing 20 Hypothetical Questions.
I'm asking other people too and will share the final % results eventually...
1) Would you be willing to spend a night alone in a remote house that is supposedly haunted, just for the sake of it? (knowing nothing more about the history of the house than that) There is no electricity though there is running water and other utilities, and you can bring your own flashlight and/or lantern and such. The nearest neighbors live 5 miles away.
2) If a new medicine were developed that would cure arthritis but cause a fatal reaction in 1% of those who took it, would you want it to be released to the public?
3) You discover that your wonderful one-year-old child is, because of a mix-up at the hospital, not yours. What would you do? Would you want to exchange the child to try to correct the "mistake"?
4) Would you accept $1,000,000 in U.S. dollars (or the equivelant in whatever currency) to leave your country and never set foot in it again?
5) Which gender do you think has it easier in our culture?
6) (For this question, if you're currently in a mate relationship then answer as if you were single) You have the chance to meet someone with whom you can have the most satisfying love imaginable -- the stuff of dreams. However, you know that in six months the person will have sex with someone else, and then when you eventually find out they will leave you for them and want nothing more to do with you. Knowing the pain that would follow, would you still want to meet the person and fall in love and experience the 6 months of bliss? You would forget your foreknowledge of the events in store for you, too.
7) If you knew of a way to use your estate, following your death, to greatly benefit all of humanity, would you do it and leave only a minimal amount (10%) to your family?
8) Would you be willing to murder an innocent person if it would 'somehow' end all hunger in the world?
9) Would you rather be given $10,000 for your own use, or be able to give $1000 anonymously to 100 strangers? You can't pick who it's given to, though you know that all of the people could really use the money.
10) Would you be willing to give up half of what you now own (randomly selected) for a pill that would permanently change you so that one hour of sleep each day would fully refresh you?
11) If the person you were engaged to marry had an accident and became a paraplegic, would you go through with the marriage or back out of it?
12) You are offered $1,000,000 USD (or the equivalent in whatever currency) for the following act: Before you are ten pistols -- only one of which is loaded. You must pick up one of the pistols, point it at your forehead, and pull the trigger. If you can do this and walk away you do so a millionaire. Would you accept the risk?
13) Someone very close to you is in pain, paralyzed, and you 'somehow' know for certain that they will die within a month. He begs you to give him a fast-acting, painless poison so that he can die. No one else would ever know. Would you?
14) If you could have free, unlimited service for five years from an extremely good cook, chauffeur, or masseuse, which would you choose?
15) Do you feel ill at ease going out to see a movie by yourself?
16) Do you feel ill at ease going out to dinner at a resturaunt by yourself?
17) For $35,000 USD, would you go for three months without washing, brushing your teeth, or using deodorant? Assume you could not explain your reasons to anyone until after the three months is up.
18) Would you be willing to have your left middle finger surgically removed if it 'somehow' guaranteed you immunity from all diseases?
19) You 'somehow' know for certain that you will die of an incurable disease within three months. Would you allow yourself to be cryogenically frozen *within the week* if you knew it would give you a modest chance of being revived in 1,000 years and living a greatly extended life?
20) You are leading 100 people in a survivalist situation, when suddenly your lives are in danger and you must choose between two courses of action. One would cause 10 of the people to die and everyone else would live, the other would have a 70% chance of saving everyone but were it to fail then everyone would die. Which would you choose?
answers
 |
| Jagdeesh's Creative World.in |
 |
1) Would you be willing to spend a night alone in a remote house that is supposedly haunted, just for the sake of it? (knowing nothing more about the history of the house than that) There is no electricity though there is running water and other utilities, and you can bring your own flashlight and/or lantern and such. The nearest neighbors live 5 miles away.
2) If a new medicine were developed that would cure arthritis but cause a fatal reaction in 1% of those who took it, would you want it to be released to the public?
3) You discover that your wonderful one-year-old child is, because of a mix-up at the hospital, not yours. What would you do? Would you want to exchange the child to try to correct the "mistake"?
4) Would you accept $1,000,000 in U.S. dollars (or the equivelant in whatever currency) to leave your country and never set foot in it again?
5) Which gender do you think has it easier in our culture?
6) (For this question, if you're currently in a mate relationship then answer as if you were single) You have the chance to meet someone with whom you can have the most satisfying love imaginable -- the stuff of dreams. However, you know that in six months the person will have sex with someone else, and then when you eventually find out they will leave you for them and want nothing more to do with you. Knowing the pain that would follow, would you still want to meet the person and fall in love and experience the 6 months of bliss? You would forget your foreknowledge of the events in store for you, too.
7) If you knew of a way to use your estate, following your death, to greatly benefit all of humanity, would you do it and leave only a minimal amount (10%) to your family?
8) Would you be willing to murder an innocent person if it would 'somehow' end all hunger in the world?
9) Would you rather be given $10,000 for your own use, or be able to give $1000 anonymously to 100 strangers? You can't pick who it's given to, though you know that all of the people could really use the money.
10) Would you be willing to give up half of what you now own (randomly selected) for a pill that would permanently change you so that one hour of sleep each day would fully refresh you?
11) If the person you were engaged to marry had an accident and became a paraplegic, would you go through with the marriage or back out of it?
12) You are offered $1,000,000 USD (or the equivalent in whatever currency) for the following act: Before you are ten pistols -- only one of which is loaded. You must pick up one of the pistols, point it at your forehead, and pull the trigger. If you can do this and walk away you do so a millionaire. Would you accept the risk?
13) Someone very close to you is in pain, paralyzed, and you 'somehow' know for certain that they will die within a month. He begs you to give him a fast-acting, painless poison so that he can die. No one else would ever know. Would you?
14) If you could have free, unlimited service for five years from an extremely good cook, chauffeur, or masseuse, which would you choose?
15) Do you feel ill at ease going out to see a movie by yourself?
16) Do you feel ill at ease going out to dinner at a resturaunt by yourself?
17) For $35,000 USD, would you go for three months without washing, brushing your teeth, or using deodorant? Assume you could not explain your reasons to anyone until after the three months is up.
18) Would you be willing to have your left middle finger surgically removed if it 'somehow' guaranteed you immunity from all diseases?
19) You 'somehow' know for certain that you will die of an incurable disease within three months. Would you allow yourself to be cryogenically frozen *within the week* if you knew it would give you a modest chance of being revived in 1,000 years and living a greatly extended life?
20) You are leading 100 people in a survivalist situation, when suddenly your lives are in danger and you must choose between two courses of action. One would cause 10 of the people to die and everyone else would live, the other would have a 70% chance of saving everyone but were it to fail then everyone would die. Which would you choose?
answers
Well, to answer question number 1 (then follow up answers by editting my post).
Hell no. For what purpose? To scare myself into having a heart attack? To prove that ghosts/spirits do or don't exist? For a thrill while being convinced that there's a good chance I won't be waking up in the morning even if I can manage to get to sleep.
I'm not sure what to make of apparitions or the like - but I definitely wouldn't call it superstition. I certainly believe there's a possibility such things do occur (depending on what your are referring to).
I don't think the ghosts would appreciate me coming into their house for a little thrill seeking camping trip.
2. I don't know. I've never had arthritis so I don't know how painful it is or how it can hinder someone. However, assuming everyone is informed of the risk, it would be there decision whether to take it or not. 1% is very very low. Heck, half of all prescription drugs probably have a %1 occurence of a fatality (there's almost always at least a %5 occurence of severe and adverse side effects in all scripts aside from things like allergy and heart burn meds - though these aren't always fatal, could be things like severe seizures or hives which could be fatal if not promptly treated). So I guess, yes.
3. I would never have a child, but yes (assuming the real child could be located and the current could be given to the biological parents who would have to be decent). The child is only 1 year of age, and it would be more painful for the parents than the child. In fact, the child would have no memory of the first parents at all because babies brains are not developed enough at that stage to retain such memories later in life. All babies act the same. When hilter was 1 year old, he had a cute face and wet his pants too.
4. No
5. Don't understand the question.
6. Uummmmm *pauses for a moment* hell no. I would not take the 6 months, I would avoid her completely. Love has to last. And all of you can bash me and tell me it ends with death if you want, that's not going to change my mind. If my love is that strong I won't let anything pull us apart.
7. Yes, I can't be personally biased to my "family" (though as I said I would never have a child) against 6 billion other people. And there's nothing to say my "family" couldn't take care of "itself" without my excess assests.
8. Yes. After seeing people die because their rib cages busted through the skin on their chest because they were so thin due to lack of food (the starvation itself didn't kill them). This happens all of the time in Africa. There are a billion people suffering from mal-nutrition alone - I can't spare one person's life for that.
9. I'd give the money away.
10. No. I need my sleep and rest. Too much life causes too much stress (even if I felt fully refreshed, I would spend 23 hours a day awake, which I'd have more to deal with - I wouldn't get enough relief)
11. Yes.
12. Um, no.
13. Yes, I would give him the poison.
14. Um, none. I don't have a use for any of the 3 (and I don't need anyone else making me more lazy).
15. I very rarely go to movies, but no, I would not feel uncomfortable going by myself.
16. Yeah, I wouldn't go out to dinner at rest. by myself
17. No. This may not be why, but did you know not brushing your teeth for that long can get you killed (while it may not neccesarily, it could).
18. It depends what type of diseases you are talking about. I can't determine right now, but if I need my left middle finger for computer work (i.e., keyboard typing), then no.
19. Not sure on that. There's no way to avoid death. And I don't know if I should be around here 1,000 years from now. But I would likely say yes, freeze me up.
20. Not sure
Hell no. For what purpose? To scare myself into having a heart attack? To prove that ghosts/spirits do or don't exist? For a thrill while being convinced that there's a good chance I won't be waking up in the morning even if I can manage to get to sleep.
I'm not sure what to make of apparitions or the like - but I definitely wouldn't call it superstition. I certainly believe there's a possibility such things do occur (depending on what your are referring to).
I don't think the ghosts would appreciate me coming into their house for a little thrill seeking camping trip.
2. I don't know. I've never had arthritis so I don't know how painful it is or how it can hinder someone. However, assuming everyone is informed of the risk, it would be there decision whether to take it or not. 1% is very very low. Heck, half of all prescription drugs probably have a %1 occurence of a fatality (there's almost always at least a %5 occurence of severe and adverse side effects in all scripts aside from things like allergy and heart burn meds - though these aren't always fatal, could be things like severe seizures or hives which could be fatal if not promptly treated). So I guess, yes.
3. I would never have a child, but yes (assuming the real child could be located and the current could be given to the biological parents who would have to be decent). The child is only 1 year of age, and it would be more painful for the parents than the child. In fact, the child would have no memory of the first parents at all because babies brains are not developed enough at that stage to retain such memories later in life. All babies act the same. When hilter was 1 year old, he had a cute face and wet his pants too.
4. No
5. Don't understand the question.
6. Uummmmm *pauses for a moment* hell no. I would not take the 6 months, I would avoid her completely. Love has to last. And all of you can bash me and tell me it ends with death if you want, that's not going to change my mind. If my love is that strong I won't let anything pull us apart.
7. Yes, I can't be personally biased to my "family" (though as I said I would never have a child) against 6 billion other people. And there's nothing to say my "family" couldn't take care of "itself" without my excess assests.
8. Yes. After seeing people die because their rib cages busted through the skin on their chest because they were so thin due to lack of food (the starvation itself didn't kill them). This happens all of the time in Africa. There are a billion people suffering from mal-nutrition alone - I can't spare one person's life for that.
9. I'd give the money away.
10. No. I need my sleep and rest. Too much life causes too much stress (even if I felt fully refreshed, I would spend 23 hours a day awake, which I'd have more to deal with - I wouldn't get enough relief)
11. Yes.
12. Um, no.
13. Yes, I would give him the poison.
14. Um, none. I don't have a use for any of the 3 (and I don't need anyone else making me more lazy).
15. I very rarely go to movies, but no, I would not feel uncomfortable going by myself.
16. Yeah, I wouldn't go out to dinner at rest. by myself
17. No. This may not be why, but did you know not brushing your teeth for that long can get you killed (while it may not neccesarily, it could).
18. It depends what type of diseases you are talking about. I can't determine right now, but if I need my left middle finger for computer work (i.e., keyboard typing), then no.
19. Not sure on that. There's no way to avoid death. And I don't know if I should be around here 1,000 years from now. But I would likely say yes, freeze me up.
20. Not sure
Best Regards,
Jagdeesh
Jagdeesh
No comments:
Post a Comment